When you think in categories
you underestimate
how different two facts are
when they fall in the same category.
When you think in categories
you overestimate
how different they are
when there happens to be a boundary in between them.
There are no buckets.2
When you pay attention to
categorical boundaries
you don't see the big picture.
Take
the rainbow from violet to red7
an infinite number
of wavelengths in between.
We have rules in English
you take a continuum
and you break it into pieces
that's what you call
a color
it's easier to deal with.
All there are
are
temporary platforms6,
each platform
simply the easiest most convenient way
of describing the outcome.
We're not going to fall for categorical thinking
this is a complicated subject
but we're smart
we're going to be more sophisticated in our thinking than
endocrinologists and geneticists and all of these folks…
Let me read you a few quotes
to show just how much some of these folks don't understand
(1) Give me a child at birth from any background
and let me control
the total environment in which he is raised
and I will turn him into anything I wish him to be
— doctor, lawyer, beggar, or thief.
John Watson, 19123
one of the founding fathers
of a school of psychology called behaviorism.
Behaviorism
reached an apogee with
BF Skinner9 in the 1950s
this notion that if you could control
the rewards the punishments
the positive of the negative reinforcement
you could turn anybody
into anything you want.
We now know that's not possible
we know that all you have to do is throw in
one other factor like
a lot of
protein malnutrition during fetal life8
and you're not going to be able to do that
you cannot have all the control over the environment
and turn somebody into whatever you want
Here's a guy living pathologically in this bucket
that behavior could be explained solely
by reward and punishment.
(2) Normal psychic life
depends upon the good functioning of brain synapses.
Mental disorders appear as a result of
synaptic derangements.
Synaptic adjustments
will then modify the corresponding ideas and
force them into different channels.
Using this approach,
we obtain cures and improvements,
but no failures.
Any guesses?
Yes, you in the back.
Electroshock therapy?
You wish it were as gentle
as electroshock therapy.
António Egas Moniz4,
in his speech accepting the Nobel Prize.
He invented frontal lobotomies.
Something done to tens and hundreds of thousands of people
who had absolutely nothing wrong with them.
(3) The selection for social utility must be accomplished by some social institution
if mankind is not to be ruined by
domestication-induced degeneracy.
The racial idea
as the basis of our state
has already accomplished much in this respect.
We may, and we must, rely on the healthy instincts of
the best of our people
for the extermination of elements of the population
loaded with dregs.
Anybody want to guess?
Hitler?
No, he was a little bit busy at the time.
And Hitler was not a behavioral biologist.
Konrad Lorenz5: one of the founding fathers of ethology
everybody knows him from all the little kid nature books
He discovered imprinting in birds.
He was this little Austrian guy with a big white beard
he's always in these little Austrian shorts and suspenders
there would be a whole bunch of duckies following him
because they thought he was mom.
He was totally charming and irresistible.
He also happened to be one of
Hitler's main scientific propagandists
who went to his grave saying that there was
nothing wrong with what he did.
These are
not crappy fourth-rate scientists.
These are
the most influential scientists of the last century.
These are
people who influenced how people were educated, and
when we decided it wasn't worth the effort.
These are
people whose influence led to
the brains being destroyed
of hundreds of thousands of people who had
nothing wrong with them.
These are the
people who led to the notion that
you fix up a problem that doesn't exist
by exterminating nine million people.
Pathologically
living inside their own buckets
and how they could explain
the entire world.
There are no buckets
all there are
are temporary platforms.
[found poem. source: Sapolsky, Robert. "Introduction to Human Behavioral Biology,"
Stanford Human Behavioral Biology (lecture 1), recorded 2010, YouTube.
Composed from memory of the lecture as delivered ca. 2003–2004;
exact quotations verified against the 2010 recording transcript.]